X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T vs Mazda CX-9 2023 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 105129
SAR 137450
SAR 101144
SAR 132250
SAR 1415
SAR 1850
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
210
4
4
1598 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4749 mm
5075
1900 mm
1969
1720 mm
1716
2745 mm
2930
480 L
407
210 mm
/
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
11.9
57 L
74
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
197 BHP
226 BHP
290 Nm
420
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
