X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 105498
TBD
SAR 101490
TBD
SAR 1420
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
185km/h
/
4
/
1598 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7
5
20"
17
5 Doors
5
4724
4318
1900
1831
1720
1662
2720
2610
480 L
/
210 mm
/
/
Flush Door
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
/
57 L
/
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
4 Way
Manual
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Cloth
Digital
/
✓
✓
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Dual Front Airbags
Infotainment
10.25
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
8
4
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
7DCT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson
/
Multi Link
/
EPS
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated
/
Disc
/
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6T
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
4
/
197
111 BHP
5500
/
290
/
4000
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
ECO, Normal
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
