ZS 1.5L STD vs TIGGO 7 LUXURY Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 57134
TBD
SAR 54970
TBD
SAR 769
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
12.8
/
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
17
18
5
5
4323
4500
1809
1842
1653
1746
2585
2670
359/1166
/
145
/
/
Flush Door
Fuel Economy
17.2
16.6
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
12.3
✓
/
✓
✓
4
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
SONY
Transmission
CVT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
197 BHP
88
/
180
290
/
Turbocharge
/
1.5T
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
