ZS 1.5T LUX vs 500 Signature 3.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Luxury interior design
- Equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Large size hinders maneuverability
- Relatively high price
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 19.11
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 133.77
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 573.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6975.15
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
200 km/h
/
6
/
2899 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
5 Doors
4430
4886 mm
1818
1934 mm
1635
1905 mm
2610
2850 mm
359/1166
545 L
145
224 m
Fuel Economy
15.9
8 Km/L
45
80 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
14.6
✓
/
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
348 BHP
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
500 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
