03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus vs Camry 3.5L 40th Anniversary (298 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
SAR 142496
SAR 142123
SAR 137080
SAR 136711
SAR 1918
SAR 1913
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.31
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 114.17
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 505.61
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5953.15
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
235 km/h
4
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4697
4885 mm
1843
1840 mm
1448
1445 mm
2730
2824 mm
/
4 Doors
/
427 L
Fuel Economy
14.3
7 Km/L
/
60 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
front row seats
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
265 BHP
298 BHP
380
356 Nm
/
V
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
