C5 2025 Comfort vs MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 74212
SAR 77710
SAR 71360
SAR 74750
SAR 999
SAR 1046
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
170
4
4
1496 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1381
/
5
/
4400
4314
1830
1809
1588
1624
2630
2585
360/1075
448
Fuel Economy
11.2
17.2
51
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
156 BHP
112 BHP
230
150
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
ECO, Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
