C5 2025 Comfort vs Toyota Rush 2023 1.5L STD (7-Seater) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Price Comparison
SAR 74212
SAR 76150
SAR 71360
SAR 73250
SAR 999
SAR 1025
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
175
4
4
1496 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1381
/
5
/
4400
4435
1830
1695
1588
1705
2630
2685
360/1075
213
Fuel Economy
11.2
12.5
51
45
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
156 BHP
103 BHP
230
135
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
ECO, Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
