Captiva LS vs Mazda CX-9 2023 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 79340
SAR 137450
SAR 76300
SAR 132250
SAR 1068
SAR 1850
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210
/
4
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
18
/
1051L
407
/
5075
/
1969
/
1716
/
2930
Fuel Economy
/
11.9
/
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2 Front and sides
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.4
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Mcpherson
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
HALOGEN
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
144 BHP
226 BHP
/
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
Manual
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
