Ciaz 1.5L GL vs Mitsubishi Attrage 2024 1.2 GLX HL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- Low fuel consumption
- Low maintenance cost
- Easy maneuverability in the city
Negative
- Engine performance is modest
- Limited internal quality
- Insufficient noise insulation
Price Comparison
SAR 55201
SAR 56230
SAR 53102
SAR 54050
SAR 743
SAR 757
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
170
4
4
1462 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4490 mm
4245
1730 mm
1670
1475 mm
1515
2650 mm
2550
480 L
450
160 m
/
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
20.0
43 L
42
16.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard LCD
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
103 BHP
76 BHP
138 Nm
100
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
