City LX 1.5L vs City LX 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
SAR 77409
SAR 77409
SAR 74445
SAR 74445
SAR 1042
SAR 1042
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
/
1788 mm
/
1467 mm
/
2650 mm
/
506 L
/
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
/
40 L
/
13 Km/L
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
/
145 Nm
/
