City LX 1.5L vs MG GT 2024 1.5L CVT COM Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- Attractive sporty design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited background space
- Less acceleration compared to some competitors
- Limited engine options
Price Comparison
SAR 77409
SAR 77710
SAR 74445
SAR 74750
SAR 1042
SAR 1046
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
185
4
4
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
4675
1788 mm
1842
1467 mm
1473
2650 mm
2680
506 L
401
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
17.5
40 L
45
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
118 BHP
145 Nm
150
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
