City LX 1.5L vs Jaguar XF 2023 2.0T S (250 PS) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 77409
TBD
SAR 74445
TBD
SAR 1042
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
244
4
4
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
4954
1788 mm
2091
1467 mm
1457
2650 mm
2960
506 L
540
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
14.7
40 L
74
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
247 BHP
145 Nm
365
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
