CT5 V 2025 vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 285671
SAR 217026
SAR 274853
SAR 208826
SAR 3845
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.13 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 454.35
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
210
6
6
2998 cc
/
American
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4922
5040
2039
1905
1452
1479
2946
3052
336 L
455
102
/
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
9.3
64 L
70
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Smart Entry
/
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✔
Driver Seat
✔
/
✔
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
Electric
/
✔
/
✔
✓
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
✓
Android LCD
/
✔
/
15
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
10 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
LED
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.0
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
360 BHP
300 BHP
550 Nm
358
Technologies
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
