Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs 212 Adventure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 115680
SAR 127048
SAR 111299
SAR 122237
SAR 1557
SAR 1710
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1590 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4590 mm
4705
1900 mm
1895
1685 mm
1936
2720 mm
2860
160 mm
235
/
2150
/
1598
/
1598
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
9.1
57 L
80
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
194 BHP
248 BHP
290 Nm
410
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
