Expedition 2025 AWD vs Mazda CX-9 2023 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 137450
TBD
SAR 132250
TBD
SAR 1850
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.12 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.98
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 97.86
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 419.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5102.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210
6
4
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5636
5075
2029
1969
1941
1716
3343
2930
592
407
Fuel Economy
8.1
11.9
107
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
✓
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
3.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
440 BHP
226 BHP
691
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
