Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2 vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
SAR 287377
SAR 89220
SAR 276481
SAR 85799
SAR 3868
SAR 1201
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
190
6
4
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
5636
4571
2029
1855
1941
1719
3343
2708
592
430
Fuel Economy
11
14.7
107
55
Comfort
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
Interior
8
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
6
/
Transmission
✓
✔
10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
275/65 R18
/
275/65 R18
/
/
✔
Exterior
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
3.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
380 BHP
171 BHP
637
275
Technologies
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
