GLC 200 4Matic vs Land Cruiser GXR-V Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 337901
SAR 337389
SAR 325105
SAR 324645
SAR 4548
SAR 4541
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 20.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 141.12
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 100.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 564.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 403.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 7358.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5256
Hide common specs
Car Information
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4656
5115
1890
1980
1639
1945
2873
/
550
/
/
20
/
5
Fuel Economy
7.1
10.1
66
110
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
4.2
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
/
Central + Rear Differential Lock
/
10
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
Wheels/brakes
/
265/55 R20
/
265/55 R20
Engine
2.0
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
211 BHP
409 BHP
350
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
3 Mode
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
