Honda HR-V 2024 1.8 i-VTEC DX vs Mazda CX-9 2023 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Flexible interior design and practical space
- Fuel efficiency and economical maintenance
- Driving comfort and good wheelbase adjustment
Negative
- Insufficient engine performance in some cases
- The quality of interior materials needs to be improved
- Standard equipment is limited in basic categories
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 105057
SAR 137450
SAR 101085
SAR 132250
SAR 1414
SAR 1850
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4348
5075
1772
1969
1605
1716
2610
2930
688
407
Fuel Economy
16.9
11.9
50
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
140 BHP
226 BHP
172
420
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
