Hyundai Kona 2024 1.6L Comfort Hybrid vs Changan CS95 2020 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and stylish design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Poor off road performance
- Light noise inside the cabin at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 119397
SAR 119538
SAR 114885
SAR 114989
SAR 1607
SAR 1609
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
10.5
/
Engine / Motor
194
185
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4.165
4949
1.801
1930
1.565
1790
2.600
2810
544
/
Fuel Economy
21.3
10.5
50
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
✓
✓
✓
✓
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
105 BHP
233 BHP
170
360
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
