Cerato 1.6L EX vs SU7 RWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 94430
SAR 117310
SAR 90848
SAR 112850
SAR 1271
SAR 1579
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
220 km/h
4
/
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4640
4997 mm
1800
1963 mm
1440
1455 mm
2700
3000 mm
427
517 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.9
/
53
/
Comfort
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
/
16.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
✔
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✔
/
✔
/
Exterior
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
128 BHP
295 BHP
154
400 Nm
Technologies
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
10
/
options.Lithium
