Cerato 1.6L LX vs City DX 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
SAR 84398
SAR 72068
SAR 81188
SAR 69339
SAR 1136
SAR 970
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.52
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.64
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 282.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 322.56
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4204.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
4
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4640
4553 mm
1800
1748 mm
1440
1476 mm
2700
2650 mm
427
/
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.9
13 Km/L
53
40 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
119 BHP
154
145 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
