Cerato 1.6L LX vs Qin L EV 470 RWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 84398
TBD
SAR 81188
TBD
SAR 1136
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 312.48
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4640
4720
1800
1880
1440
1495
2700
2820
427
/
Fuel Economy
14.9
/
53
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
225/55 R17
/
225/55 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
128 BHP
150 BHP
154
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
