Land Cruiser VX-R vs Tiggo 9 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 434485
SAR 127197
SAR 418025
SAR 122381
SAR 5848
SAR 1712
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.4
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 100.8
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 403.2
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5256
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
Dimensions
7
5
20
/
5115
4820
1980
1930
1945
1712
/
2820
Fuel Economy
10.1
/
110
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Doors
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
Driver Seat
12.3
10.25
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Driver Seat
/
Premium Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Four
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Front + Knee + Side (1st & 2nd Row) + Curtain
up to 10
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
15.6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
14
Transmission
✓
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
AT
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
265/55 R20
/
265/55 R20
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
409
250
650
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Economic + Standard + Sports Sandy + Road + Muddy + Ground + Snowfield + Off Road
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
