Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade vs Taurus Titanium Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- An excellent balance between comfort and performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technology features
Negative
- Fuel consumption is above average
- Unavailability of all-wheel drive
- Difficulty maneuvering in narrow areas
Price Comparison
SAR 81280
SAR 198007
SAR 78200
SAR 190531
SAR 1094
SAR 2665
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4660
4972 mm
1795
1875 mm
1440
1498 mm
444
520 L
/
19
/
5 Doors
/
2930 mm
/
205 mm
Fuel Economy
18.2
15.5Km/L
51
66 L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8" Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
7
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
/
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
153 BHP
239 BHP
/
In-Line
/
4
/
382 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Sport, Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
