Mazda 6 Entry vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
SAR 87290
SAR 104012
SAR 83950
SAR 100058
SAR 1175
SAR 1400
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
221
195 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
4 Doors
4865
4885 mm
1840
1840 mm
1450
1445 mm
429
493 L
/
2824 mm
Fuel Economy
/
14.9 Km/L
/
60 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Interior
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
6
/
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
190 BHP
204 BHP
252
243 Nm
91
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
