Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 163750
TBD
SAR 157550
TBD
SAR 2204
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5075
5115
1969
1980
1716
1920
2930
/
Fuel Economy
74
110
/
9.3
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
226 BHP
304 BHP
420
700
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
