Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs T2 Standard Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and modern design
- Outstanding financial value
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Suspension tuning is strict
- Average noise insulation
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 154985
TBD
SAR 149124
TBD
SAR 2086
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
180 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5100
4785 mm
1994
2006 mm
1756
1880 mm
3010
2800 mm
566
752 L
/
5 Doors
/
220 mm
Fuel Economy
9.1
11 Km/L
/
70 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
345 BHP
250 BHP
500
390 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
