MG GT 2024 1.5L CVT COM vs 6 Pure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive sporty design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited background space
- Less acceleration compared to some competitors
- Limited engine options
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Price Comparison
SAR 77710
SAR 90634
SAR 74750
SAR 87167
SAR 1046
SAR 1220
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
210 km/h
4
4
/
2488 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4675
4870 mm
1842
1840 mm
1473
1450 mm
2680
2830 mm
401
419 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
17.5
15 Km/L
45
62 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
185 BHP
150
250 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓