CarteaCompare CarsPreface GF 2025 vs 6 Pure

Preface GF 2025 vs 6 Pure Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Stylish and modern exterior design
  • High internal manufacturing quality
  • Great driving and control fun

Negative

  • The back space may be tight
  • The suspension system can be harsh on off road
  • The interface of some technologies needs improvements

Price Comparison

SAR 106247

SAR 90634

SAR 102235

SAR 87167

SAR 1430

SAR 1220

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.07 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 8.16

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 8.16

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 57.09

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 57.09

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 244.65

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 244.65

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 2976.58

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 2976.58

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

6.9

/

325

/

Engine / Motor

/

210 km/h

/

4

/

2488 cc

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4

5 Doors

4825

4870 mm

1880

1840 mm

1469

1450 mm

2800

2830 mm

/

419 L

Fuel Economy

14

15 Km/L

/

62 L

/

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

6

HARMAN Infinity

/

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

7DCT

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

215

185 BHP

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

/

250 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Geely Related Car

Mazda Related Car

Mazda Related New Car

Mazda Related Used Car