Q3 35 TFSI vs Sportage Smartstream 2.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 152449
SAR 102970
SAR 146644
SAR 99046
SAR 2052
SAR 1386
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
220 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4385 mm
4515 mm
2019 mm
865 mm
1608 mm
1650 mm
2603 mm
2680 mm
460 L
591 L
/
4 Doors
/
/
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
12 Km/L
58 L
54 L
15.4 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
152 BHP
250 Nm
192 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
