Shine E2 vs Suzuki Ciaz 2024 1.5L GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Price Comparison
SAR 61443
SAR 62180
SAR 59115
SAR 59800
SAR 827
SAR 837
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
165
4
4
1496 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17
/
4 Doors
/
4670 mm
4490
1812 mm
1730
1490 mm
1475
2680 mm
2650
454 L
495
150 mm
/
Fuel Economy
14
16.7
50 L
43
14 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
205/55 R17
/
205/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
123 BHP
103 BHP
158 Nm
138
Technologies
✓
✓
ECO/ SPORT
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
