Suzuki Ciaz 2024 1.5L GLX vs Eado Plus Limited Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 72950
SAR 77934
SAR 70150
SAR 74970
SAR 982
SAR 1049
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.58
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 67.03
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 296.83
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3494.88
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
165
/
4
/
/
1494 mL
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490
4770
1730
1840
1475
1440
2650
2765
495
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
16.7
18.4
43
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Full TFT Panel 10 Inches
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Rear
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
13.2 Inches
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
7-DCT
/
DCT
/
7
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson Independent
/
Twist-beam Non-independent
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
225/45 R18
/
225/45 R18
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
104 BHP
178 BHP
130
300
/
Turbocharge
/
4
/
DOHC
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco - Normal - Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
181
/
Transverse
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
