Suzuki Ciaz 2024 1.5L GLX vs Hongqi H5 2023 1.8T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 72950
SAR 105940
SAR 70150
SAR 101900
SAR 982
SAR 1426
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.43
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 356.19
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4193.85
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
165
/
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490
4945
1730
1845
1475
1470
2650
2875
495
/
Fuel Economy
16.7
16.7
43
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
104 BHP
196 BHP
130
320
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
