T Roc R-Line vs Urban Cruiser GL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Price Comparison
SAR 152159
SAR 86183
SAR 146395
SAR 82915
SAR 2048
SAR 1160
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
17
4251
4365
1819
1795
1594
1645
2603
2600
445
/
/
210
Fuel Economy
15.8
19.8
50
45 L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
8
7
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger Airbag With Front Passenger Airbag Deactivation.Curtain Airbag System For Front And Rear Passengers Incl. Side Airbags In Front.
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
9
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
4
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8 Speed Automatic
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
1.4
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
101 BHP
250
135
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
