T99 LIM vs Nissan X-Trail 2024 S AWD (5-Seater) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 110917
SAR 114270
SAR 106681
SAR 109947
SAR 1493
SAR 1538
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1805
/
20 inch
/
4800
4690
1915
1830
1685
1740
2870
2705
377
550
Fuel Economy
13.8
15.4
60
60
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
12
/
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Electronic Parking
/
245/50 R20
/
245/50 R20
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
224
169 BHP
165
/
340
233
95
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
