Taurus Titanium Hybrid vs Arrizo 8 Pro comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- An excellent balance between comfort and performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technology features
Negative
- Fuel consumption is above average
- Unavailability of all-wheel drive
- Difficulty maneuvering in narrow areas
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 116640
TBD
SAR 112200
TBD
SAR 1570
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 4.66
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 32.62
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 144.46
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 1700.9
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
19
17 inch
5 Doors
/
4972 mm
4780
1875 mm
1843
1498 mm
1469
2930 mm
2790
520 L
/
205 mm
/
Fuel Economy
23.4
/
/
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8" Digital
√
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
Safety
✓
✓
8
4
✓
/
✓
√
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
Infotainment
13.2
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
205/55 R17
235/45 R19
205/55 R17
/
√
/
Electronic Parking
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
يدوي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.6
Hybrid
Gasoline
4
/
185HP/64HP(Battery)
197
382 Nm
290
/
Turbocharge
/
137
/
5500
/
91 号汽油
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
Normal, Sport, Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
