Taurus Trend vs Camry 3.5L 40th Anniversary (298 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- An excellent balance between comfort and performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technology features
Negative
- Fuel consumption is above average
- Unavailability of all-wheel drive
- Difficulty maneuvering in narrow areas
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
SAR 140485
SAR 142123
SAR 135125
SAR 136711
SAR 1891
SAR 1913
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.31
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 114.17
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 505.61
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5953.15
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
235 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
5 Doors
4 Doors
4972 mm
4885 mm
1875 mm
1840 mm
1498 mm
1445 mm
2930 mm
2824 mm
520 L
427 L
205 mm
/
Fuel Economy
15.5Km/L
7 Km/L
66 L
60 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8" Digital
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Plush Fabric Inserts/Leather bolster
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
13.2
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
6
9
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/50 R18
/
235/50 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
239 BHP
298 BHP
382 Nm
356 Nm
/
None
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
Normal, Sport, Eco
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
