Tiggo8 Pro Max COM vs X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 105129
TBD
SAR 101144
TBD
SAR 1415
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
220 km/h
/
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
7
18
/
5
5 Doors
4720
4749 mm
1860
1900 mm
1705
1720 mm
2710
2745 mm
/
480 L
/
210 mm
Fuel Economy
14
13 Km/L
/
57 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
LCD
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
/
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
6
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
10.25
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
8
8
SONY
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/55 R18
/
235/55 R18
/
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0L TDGI
/
254 BHP
197 BHP
390
290 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
