Veloz GX vs Mazda CX-9 2023 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical in fuel consumption
- High reliability and stable performance
Negative
- Limited engine capacity for high power
- Relatively old entertainment technologies
- Interior materials are less luxurious than some competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 85955
SAR 137450
SAR 82671
SAR 132250
SAR 1157
SAR 1850
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
210
4
4
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4475 mm
5075
1750 mm
1969
1700 mm
1716
2890 mm
2930
350 L
407
205 m
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
11.9
43 L
74
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Vinyl Upholstery
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
105 BHP
226 BHP
138 Nm
420
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
