Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 220139
SAR 105129
SAR 211794
SAR 101144
SAR 2963
SAR 1415
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.31
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 114.17
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 489.3
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5953.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
220 km/h
6
4
3600 cc
1598 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4 Doors
5 Doors
4785 mm
4749 mm
1877 mm
1900 mm
1801 mm
1720 mm
3007 mm
2745 mm
487 L
480 L
246 m
210 mm
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
13 Km/L
87 L
57 L
7 Km/L
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
10.25
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
8
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.6 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
285 BHP
197 BHP
352 Nm
290 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
