ZR-V EX vs Toyota Fortuner 2024 2.7L GX2 (4X4) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Comfortable and practical interior design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced security technologies and systems
Negative
- Luggage capacity is somewhat limited
- Pricing may be higher than competitors
- Modest engine performance compared to some competitors
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Price Comparison
SAR 135732
SAR 139604
SAR 130560
SAR 134320
SAR 1827
SAR 1879
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.12 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.98
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 97.86
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 433.38
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5102.7
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
180
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1488
/
18 英寸
/
4567
4795
1840
1855
1621
1835
2657
2750
380
348
186
/
Fuel Economy
/
8.1
/
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
√
✓
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
12
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
√
/
CVT
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
麦弗逊式独立悬挂
/
多连杆式独立悬挂
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
225/55 R18
/
225/55 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
/
有
/
4
/
180
160 BHP
132.4
/
6000
/
240
245
1700-4500
/
直喷
/
Technologies
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
