300 Conqueror 2.0T vs Hyundai Santa Fe 2023 3.5L Smart+ (AWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- The exterior design is stylish and attractive
- The interior is spacious and comfortable
- Advanced driving and safety technology
Negative
- Average engine performance
- Fuel efficiency can be improved
- The response of the multimedia system is sometimes slow
Price Comparison
SAR 158847
SAR 159367
SAR 152835
SAR 153335
SAR 2138
SAR 2145
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200
4
6
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4770
1930 mm
1890
1927 mm
1678
2750 mm
2766
400 L
1036
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
11.8
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
280 BHP
387 Nm
363
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
