300 Conqueror 2.0T vs Jeep Wrangler 2018 Sport 3.6L A/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Price Comparison
SAR 158847
SAR 161000
SAR 152835
SAR 154900
SAR 2138
SAR 2167
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
157
4
6
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4223
1930 mm
1873
1927 mm
1865
2750 mm
2268
400 L
360
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
8.8
75 L
70
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
285 BHP
387 Nm
347
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
