300 Conqueror 2.0T vs MG4 XPower 64KWh 2025 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 158847
SAR 159810
SAR 152835
SAR 153750
SAR 2138
SAR 2151
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
/
1930 mm
/
1927 mm
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
430BHP
387 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
