C5 2025 Comfort vs Dashing 1.6L Turbo Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Price Comparison
SAR 74212
SAR 115680
SAR 71360
SAR 111299
SAR 999
SAR 1557
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1496 cc
1590 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1381
/
5
5 Doors
4400
4590 mm
1830
1900 mm
1588
1685 mm
2630
2720 mm
360/1075
/
/
160 mm
Fuel Economy
11.2
12 Km/L
51
57 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
4
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
10.25
15.6
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
/
6
8
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
156 BHP
194 BHP
230
290 Nm
/
None
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
ECO, Sport
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
