Ciaz 1.5L GL vs 03 Hyper Plus Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 55201
SAR 113590
SAR 53102
SAR 109250
SAR 743
SAR 1529
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
250
4
4
1462 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4490 mm
4684
1730 mm
1843
1475 mm
1460
2650 mm
2730
480 L
/
160 m
/
/
1560
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
17
43 L
/
16.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
front row seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard LCD
/
4
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson Strut
/
Multi-link
Wheels/brakes
/
225/45 R18
/
225/45 R18
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED with Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
103 BHP
218 BHP
138 Nm
325
/
Drive-E 2.0TD T4 Evo Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
