City LX 1.5L vs Honda Civic 2023 1.5T Sport Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Price Comparison
SAR 77409
SAR 149327
SAR 74445
SAR 143635
SAR 1042
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
4
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
4674
1788 mm
1801
1467 mm
1415
2650 mm
2736
506 L
413
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
15.4
40 L
/
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
119 BHP
180 BHP
145 Nm
240
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
