Coolray GS vs MG ZS 2023 1.5L LUX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 76451
SAR 77710
SAR 73555
SAR 74750
SAR 1029
SAR 1046
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
GCC
/
/
170
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
/
4380
4314
1800
1809
1615
1624
2600
2585
/
448
Fuel Economy
17.8
17.2
45
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
10.25" TFT Screen
/
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
Leather Wrapped
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Electric
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
172 BHP
112 BHP
290
150
91
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Comfort, Economy, Adaptive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
