Coolray GS vs Toyota Rush 2023 1.5L STD (7-Seater) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Price Comparison
SAR 76451
SAR 76150
SAR 73555
SAR 73250
SAR 1029
SAR 1025
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
GCC
/
/
175
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4
/
4380
4435
1800
1695
1615
1705
2600
2685
/
213
Fuel Economy
17.8
12.5
45
45
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
10.25" TFT Screen
/
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
Leather Wrapped
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Electric
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
172 BHP
103 BHP
290
135
91
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Comfort, Economy, Adaptive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
