Coolray GS vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 76451
TBD
SAR 73555
TBD
SAR 1029
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 454.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
GCC
/
/
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
/
4380
4385
1800
1875
1615
1850
2600
2560
/
500
Fuel Economy
17.8
7.7
45
69
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
10.25" TFT Screen
/
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
Leather Wrapped
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7
/
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Electric
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
172 BHP
184 BHP
290
303
91
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Comfort, Economy, Adaptive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
